DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PC-0033149·shasta·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing 2 months agoPetition for Waiver of Accountings GRANTED; confirmation of filing Proof of Service continued

CONSERVATORSHIP OF KAREN HAMBEK

Confirmation of filing Proof of Service of Conservatorship Care Plan 1 and Notice of Filing of Inventory and Appraisal; Petition for Waiver of Accountings

Hearing date
Jun 22, 2026
Department
44
Prevailing
Mixed
Next hearing
Jul 27, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25PC-0033149 This matter is on calendar for confirmation of filing the Proof of Service of the Conservatorship Care Plan 1 and Notice of Filing of Inventory and Appraisal. Based on the declaration filed on June 9, 2026, the Court will dispense with notice to Mary Hambek of the Conservatorship Care Plan 1. Proof of service of the Notice of Filing of Inventory and Appraisal has not been filed. The matter is continued to Monday, July 27, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for confirmation of filing Proof of Service of Notice of Filing of Inventory and Appraisal.

This matter is also on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Waiver of Accountings. The matter has been properly noticed with proof of service on file. No objections have been raised. The paperwork appears to be in order. The Petition is GRANTED. A proposed Order has been filed with the Court and will be executed. Future Accountings are waived, unless the requirements of Probate Code §§ 2628(b) or (c) are met. The future date of June 14, 2027, for confirmation of filing the First Account is vacated. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

CONSERVATORSHIP OF HALEY JOHNSTON

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share