DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CIVSB2322839·sanbernardino·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 2 months agoDefendant’s Motion to Compel Compliance to Discovery is deemed MOOT. Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED.

Powell v. MacDonald & Cody, LLC, et al

Compel Compliance and Request for Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 10, 2026
Department
S24
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1200

Parties

PlaintiffSonya Powell
DefendantMacDonald & Cody, LLC

Attorneys

Rosen Saba, LLP(Rosen Saba, LLP)for Plaintiff

Ruling

Powell v. MacDonald & Cody, LLC, et al Motion: Compel Compliance and Request for Sanctions Movant: MacDonald & Cody, LLC (M&C/Defendant) Respondent: Sonya Powell, individually and as Successor in Interest to David Jason Powell (Powell/Plaintiff)

Before the Court is M&C’s motion to compel Plaintiff’s compliance with supplemental verified responses served on January 26, 2026, in which Plaintiff Sonya agreed to produce documents in response to M&C’s Request for Production (Set 3), Request No.

56. The only issue remaining is sanctions. The instant motion was filed March 6, 20206, however it was not until March 27, 2026, when defense counsel again inquired about production that Plaintiff finally produced a copy of her passport. Plaintiff’s counsel’s arguments about the former attorney and his jury duty, as well as argument that counsel believed it had been produced, do not overcome the fact that it took a motion and a further request by defense counsel for Plaintiff to produce a copy of her passport as agreed. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Compliance to Discovery is deemed MOOT. Defendant’s request for monetary sanctions is GRANTED. Sonya Powell, individually and as Successor in Interest to David Jason Powell and her attorney of record Rosen Saba, LLP are jointly and severally sanctioned the $1200 to be paid forthwith.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share