DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV01810·santacruz·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoThe parties have agreed that the remote deposition of the PMQ will proceed on July 8, 2026, at 10 am.

PATTERSON v. TRADER JOE’S, et al.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING THE ATTENDANCE OF DEFENDANTS’ PMQ

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPATTERSON
DefendantTRADER JOE’S

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JUNE 17, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.

TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES

Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

No. 25CV01810

PATTERSON v. TRADER JOE’S, et al.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING THE ATTENDANCE OF DEFENDANTS’ PMQ

The parties have agreed that the remote deposition of the PMQ will proceed on July 8, 2026, at 10 am. The Court appreciates the parties’ productive meet and confer efforts.

No. 25CV02695

QUITEVIS v. CUEVASBADILLA

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DISMISSAL; CCP §473(b)

The unopposed motion is granted pursuant to the mandatory relief provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision b. The dismissal is vacated.

The moving party bears the burden of proving they are entitled to relief under section 473, subdivision b. The court is empowered to relieve a party “upon any terms as may be just ...from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” (§ 473, subd. (b).) Any party to the action or his or her legal representative may seek relief under section 473, subdivision b and relief is mandatory when it is based upon an attorney affidavit of fault.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share