DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV472684·santaclara·Civil·Order of Examination
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

EDGEWOOD SC LLC vs RAJ GAUTAM et al

Order of Examination

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
13
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffEDGEWOOD SC LLC
DefendantRAJ GAUTAM

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13 Honorable Daniel T. Nishigaya R. Belligan, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2240

DATE: June 17, 2026 TIME: 9:00 & 9:01 A.M. TO CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING, YOU MUST CALL (408) 808-6856 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING. You must also inform all other sides to the issue before 4:00 P.M. the day prior to the hearing that you plan to contest the ruling. The Court will not hear argument, and the tentative ruling will be adopted if these notifications are not made. (Cal. Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1); Civil Local Rule 8.D.)

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING 9:01 CALENDAR 9:01 LINE 1 22CV398906 Marzieh Abdolyousefi et al vs Mojtaba Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Taiebat et al Counsel Tsivyan and Defendant Taibat shall appear in person (physically present) in Department 13 for argument on the motion to withdraw and to allow for in camera proceedings on the motion as may be necessary. 9:01 LINE 2 25CV472684 EDGEWOOD SC LLC vs RAJ Order of Examination GAUTAM et al The Court sees no proof of service of the notice and Order to Appear. Parties to appear for examination if notice is proper, otherwise the matter will go off calendar.

- oo0oo -

5

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share