DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV440449·santaclara·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

Negar Ajayebi vs Mijia Jiang

Motion to Compel Deposition; Production of Documents & Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 18, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$2,400.00

Parties

PlaintiffNegar Ajayebi
DefendantMijia Jiang

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: June 18, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 9:00 A.M. LINE 1 24CV440449 Negar Ajayebi vs Motion to Compel Deposition; Production of Documents & Sanctions Mijia Jiang OFF CALENDAR. On June 16, 2026, moving party/Defendant Mijia Jiang withdrew her motion to compel Plaintiff Negar Ajayebi’s attendance at deposition and production of documents, and sanctions in the amount of $2,400.00 that was filed on December 18, 2026. The motion is unopposed. Per Code of Civil Procedure section 1005(b) opposition papers were due on June 5, 2026.

A failure to oppose a motion may be deemed a consent to the granting of the motion. (California Rule of Court Rule 8.54(c)). Failure to oppose a motion leads to the presumption that the defendant has no meritorious arguments. (Laguna Auto Body v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 481, 489). Given the withdrawal of the motion and non-opposition, the motion is taken off calendar. LINE 2 24CV450235 Trisha Cardenas et Motion to Strike al vs Avalonbay Scroll down to Line 2 for Tentative Ruling.

Communities, Inc. et al. LINES 24CV452605 Adriana Guicho Motion to Strike (Line # 3) and Demurrer (Line # 4) 3-4 vs General Scroll down to Lines 3-4 for Tentative Ruling. Motors, LLC. LINE 5 25CV460390 Raymond Privette Petition to Compel Arbitration et al vs Ford OFF CALENDAR. On September 10, 2025, Defendant Future Ford Motor Company Lincoln of Roseville filed this motion to compel arbitration. On June 5, et al 2026, Plaintiffs Raymond and Judy Privette filed a request for dismissal of defendant Future Ford Lincoln of Roseville.

Thus, this motion is rendered moot. LINE 6 25CV480225 Halo Petition to Compel Arbitration Microelectronics Scroll down to Line 6 for Tentative Ruling. Co., Ltd. et al vs Darson Zhang

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share