DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0002818·marin·FamilyLaw·Child Custody/Visitation
Hearing 2 months agoProceedings stayed pending determination of jurisdiction in Sacramento Superior Court.

RYAN ANDRES AFLAGUE v. DAYSIA SKEYE RITCHEY

Request for Order - Child Custody/Visitation

Hearing date
Jun 16, 2026
Department
G
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PetitionerRYAN ANDRES AFLAGUE
RespondentDAYSIA SKEYE RITCHEY

Ruling

Petitioner Ryan Andrew Aflague (Father) filed this parentage petition and a request for order (RFO) seeking custody orders on April 28, 2026. Respondent Daysia Skeye Ritchey (Mother) has not been served, but Mother filed a parentage action in Sacramento Superior Court on April 20, 2026 and served Father. Mother also filed a request for a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) in Sacramento. On June 10, 2026, this Court held a reported video conference with Judge Rei Onishi of the Sacramento Superior Court pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act; both parties were present remotely.

Judge Onishi heard the DVRO and granted a retraining order along with temporary custody orders and referred the matter to Family Court Services.

Under Family Code section 3422, the Sacramento Superior Court has exclusive continuing jurisdiction over custody issues having first issued custody orders.

Pursuant to Family Code section 3472(c), proceedings in this Court are STAYED. The matter is continued to July 28, 2026, for proof of service on Mother and for hearing on whether all proceedings should be held in Sacramento Superior Court and these proceedings dismissed without prejudice.

As authorized by CRC Rule 5.125, the Court shall prepare the formal Findings and Order After Hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share