DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD20667353·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED in part, subject to opposition, and DENIED in part. Plaintiff shall serve complete verified responses without objection to Defendant Laurence F. Nasey's First Set of Requests for Production within 5 days of notice of entry of order. Sanctions granted in the amount of $4,488. Request to compel production of documents is denied.

STANYAN HOLDINGS LLC VS. STANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Initial Responses & Production Of Documents

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$4,488

Parties

PlaintiffSTANYAN HOLDINGS LLC
DefendantSTANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC DBA TED & AL'S SERVICE
DefendantLAURENCE NASEY

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD20667353 - June 17, 2026 Hearing date: June 17, 2026 Case number: CUD20667353 Case title: STANYAN HOLDINGS LLC VS. STANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL Case Number: | | CUD20667353 | Case Title: | | STANYAN HOLDINGS LLC VS. STANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-06-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Initial Responses & Production Of Documents | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 17, 2026. Line 7.

DEFENDANT STANYAN ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC DBA TED & AL'S SERVICE, LAURENCE NASEY Motion To Compel Initial Responses & Production Of Documents is GRANTED in part, subject to opposition, and DENIED in part. Plaintiff shall serve complete verified responses without objection to Defendant Laurence F. Nasey's First Set of Requests for Production within 5 days of notice of entry of order. Sanctions granted in the amount of $4,488. Request to compel production of documents is denied, as there is no authority cited for a request to compel production of documents before the responding party has identified whether any responsive documents exist.

This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share