Defendant's Motion to Compel Responses to Defendant's Request for Admissions; Request for Monetary Sanctions; Defendant's Motion to Compel Responses to Defendant's Form Interrogatories, Set Two; Request for Monetary Sanctions
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Stanislaus County - Civil - https://www.stanislaus.courts.ca.gov/online-services/tentative-rulings/civil-tentati ve-rulings Civil Tentative Rulings June 17, 2026
The following are the tentative ruling for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21:
CV-22-004582 - E, L vs DOE 1 - a) Defendant's Motion to Compel Responses to Defendant's Request for Admissions; Request for Monetary Sanctions - CONTINUED to June 18, 2026 to be heard with other motions; b) Defendant's Motion to Compel Responses to Defendant's Form Interrogatories, Set Two; Request for Monetary Sanctions - CONTINUED to June 18, 2026 to be heard with other motions.
a-b) In the interests of the Court and the parties, the hearings will be held on the same date.
CV-25-002522 - JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA vs BOYER, MARESSA - Plaintiff's Motion to Enter Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation - GRANTED and unopposed.
Pursuant to the Stipulation between the parties of May 2025, and Defendant's failure to timely pay the sums due under said agreement, the Court finds that Defendant is currently in default of said Stipulation entitling Plaintiff to judgment. Crediting Defendant with the sum of $784 paid to Plaintiff pursuant to said Stipulation, judgment is hereby entered for Plaintiff against Defendant for $7707.00 (Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 664.6; Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel, (1999) 74 Cal. App. 4th 299).
The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22:
CV-21-001363 - NARANJO, JOSHUA vs DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF MODESTO INC - a) Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification of Declaratory Judgment and Breach of Contract Causes of Action - CONTINUED to June 18, 2026 at 8:30 am in Department 22; b) Defendant, Doctors Medical Center of Modesto Inc's Motion to Seal Records Filed in Connection with Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification - CONTINUED to June 18, 2026 at 8:30 am in Department 22.
a-b) The hearings are continued on the Court's own motion for coordination with the related motion currently set for June 18, 2026, and for further review and consideration. The hearing is CONTINUED to June 18, 2026 at 8:30 am in Department 22.
CV-22-005673 - WORTHINGTON, SUSAN vs CREATIVE ALTERNATIVES - Compliance Hearing - CONTINUED to December 2, 2026, at 8:30 am in Department 22.
The settlement administrator submitted a declaration on May 13, 2026. The declaration states that a total of 149 settlement checks, totaling $37,946.02, remain uncashed after the check cashing deadline. The declaration further states that the uncashed funds will be held for six months, that "[n]o later than October 29, 2026, ILYM Group will submit the final updated unclaimed amount and the names and contact information of all Class Members whose funds remain unclaimed," and that ILYM Group will thereafter transfer all unclaimed funds to the State Controller's Office.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The Court notes that the amount of funds issued is missing from paragraph 9 of the declaration. Having reviewed and considered the declaration filed on May 13, 2026, the Court CONTINUES this matter to December 2, 2026, at 8:30 am in Department 22 for (1) a supplemental declaration from the settlement administrator (to be filed on or before October 29, 2026) confirming the final unclaimed amount and the names and contact information of all Class Members whose funds remain unclaimed and (2) a proposed order authorizing ILYM Group to transfer all unclaimed funds to the State Controller's Office.
CV-26-000148 - GILTON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT INC vs CITY OF MODESTO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION - Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate - HEARING REQUIRED.
The Court will hold a hearing on the Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandate. For the following reasons, the