Motion for Summary Judgment
25CV-04947 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. vs. Sandra Baker
Motion for Summary Judgment
The unopposed motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is GRANTED. Upon consideration of all the evidence set forth in the papers, including some of Defendant’s responses to Plaintiff’s requests for admission and the declaration of plaintiff’s Loan Workout Specialist Jason Gil authenticating business records supporting Plaintiff’s undisputed material facts, the Court finds that there is no triable issue of material fact and Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Plaintiff has proven each element of its causes of action for breach of written contract and breach of an implied in fact contract, including the principal amount of the debt. The burden therefore shifts to Defendant to show the existence of one or more triable issues of material fact. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(1).) By not opposing the motion, Defendant has failed to meet her burden.
Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant Sandra Baker. The Court will sign the proposed order lodged with the moving papers. Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs according to proof in accordance with rule 3.1702 of the California Rules of Court and Civil Code section 1717. Plaintiff is ordered to prepare a proposed judgment, submit a cost memorandum and submit a declaration in support of any motion for reasonable attorney’s fees.
The case management conference scheduled for September 4, 2026, is vacated.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”