DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV114493·alameda·Civil·Other
Hearing 2 months agoParties to Appear

SHETH vs FCA US, LLC, et al.

Order to Show Cause Re: failure to follow Court’s Order

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
17
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSHETH
DefendantFCA US, LLC

Ruling

25CV114493: SHETH vs FCA US, LLC, et al. 06/17/2026 Order to Show Cause Re: re: failure to follow Court's Order in Department 17

Tentative Ruling - 06/16/2026 Chad A. Stegeman

Parties to Appear COUNSEL/PARTIES may appear in-person or by Zoom. To appear by zoom, Join ZoomGov Meeting https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16146216257 Meeting ID: 161 4621 6257 One tap mobile +16692545252,,16146216257# US (San Jose) +16692161590,,16146216257# US (San Jose)

If a party does not timely contest the foregoing Tentative Ruling and appear at the hearing, the Tentative Ruling will become the order of the court.

HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING?

THROUGH ECOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps: 1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select “Search” 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select “Click to Contest this Ruling” 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select “Proceed”

BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing. This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.

BOTH ECOURT AND EMAIL notices are required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share