DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0000983·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing 2 months agoCONTINUED

IN THE MATTER OF MARY JANE MARE HARDING

Report on Status of Administration; Order to Show Cause regarding sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
Department C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 9, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$149

Parties

PetitionerRaymond Gage
OtherWoodford Rowland

Attorneys

Ruling

PR0000983 IN THE MATTER OF MARY JANE MARE HARDING

1. Report on Status of Administration of Estate, filed by Raymond Gage on 6/8/26.

2. Order to Show Cause - why counsel Woodford Rowland should not be sanctioned in the amount of $149 for the failure to appear on 5/21/26 and why failed to file either a Petition or Report.

Ruling. This matter is continued to July 9, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner is ordered to: 1. Mail notice to all interested parties using the mandatory Judicial Council Form “Notice of Hearing – Decedent’s Estate or Trust” with the box checked in Item 1 stating this is a report of status of administration. (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-120.)

2. File a copy of the DE-120 that was mailed, with the Proof of Service completed on page 2 showing that all interested parties received at least fifteen days’ notice of the Report of Status of Administration. (Prob. C. § 12201(b).)

3. Submit a proposed Order to the Court. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(C), Submission of Proposed Orders.)

4. Submit declaration addressing order to show cause

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 4 | 14

5. The documents must be filed/submitted at least five court days prior to hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share