DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24-1400014·orange·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoOff calendar

Frank v. SchoolsFirst Federal Credit Union

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
C20
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Parties

PlaintiffFrank
DefendantSchoolsFirst Federal Credit Union

Ruling

added to determine whether they were bona fide purchasers for value and whether their interests in the subject vehicles and/or payments is valid.

The demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to this COA.

2) Motion to Strike

Schools’ motion to strike portions of the FAC is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as noted in the ruling on LAFCU above.

C) Navy Federal Credit Union

Defendant Navy Federal Credit Union’s (“Navy”) demurrer to the FAC is SUSTAINED.

As to COA numbers six through nine, the demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend as noted in the LAFCU ruling above.

As to COA number five, the demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend as noted in the Schools ruling above. The court will also note that while Navy argues this COA is derivative of the other COA, Plaintiff is permitted to plead in the alternative (Mendoza v. Cont'l Sales Co. (2006) 140 Cal. App. 4th 1395, 1402) even though Plaintiff has failed to plead sufficient facts to support this COA.

Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 10 days of written notice of the ruling.

LAFCU to give notice.

12. Frank v. SchoolsFirst (Off calendar) Federal Credit Union

13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share