DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2024-01398380·orange·Civil·General Civil
Hearing 2 months agoDependent on compliance

De La Torre v. Peterson Brothers

MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS

Hearing date
Jun 15, 2026
Department
N14
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDe La Torre
DefendantPeterson Brothers

Ruling

Twice, Plaintiff Hybrid Battery Inc. has attempted to file a Request for Dismissal with Prejudice of the Entire Action. (ROAs 334 and 335.) The first attempt was on 05/28/2026 and the second attempt was on 06/10/2026. Based on these filings, it appears that the motion for summary judgment should be vacated and/or deemed moot.

At the hearing, the parties shall be prepared to discuss whether Plaintiff Hybrid Battery Inc.’s operative Complaint should be dismissed.

111 OFF CALENDAR

112 SeaNet Company, Inc. DEMURRER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT v. Perley, 2024- 01398295

113 De La Torre v. Peterson MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Brothers, 2024- 01398380 The court’s ruling is dependent on whether Plaintiff complied with the court’s previous order on or before June 12, 2026.

114

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share