Doe vs. Agrawal

Additionally, the Court IMPOSES sanctions in the amount of $200 against Rudy Ginez due and payable to Bailey Law Corporation within thirty (30) days of receiving notice.

Clerk to give notice.

5. 30-2025-01467967- No tentative ruling. CU-PO-CJC Doe vs. Agrawal

6. 30-2023-01341633- Defendant Silvano Breda specially appears in this action CU-BT-CJC and moves “for an order setting aside the default and Altinex, Inc. vs. default judgment against him and [quashing] service of the Breda Summons and Complaint filed by Plaintiff Altinex, Inc.” See notice of motion, ROA 54, at 2:5-6.

Defendant contends that the default judgment is void and should be set aside under Code Civ. Proc. § 437(d) because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over him and the judgment exceeds the amount requested in the complaint. Notice of motion, 2:7-10. He also contends that service of the summons and complaint should be quashed under Code Civ. Proc. § 418.10(a)(1) because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over him. Notice of motion, 2:11-12. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

Plaintiff requested and obtained defendant’s default on November 7, 2024. See ROA 29. Plaintiff had earlier filed a declaration of its counsel in which counsel declared that defendant had been served in Canada under the Hague Convention on August 20, 2024 and submitted a copy of the Certification of Service. See ROA 25.