DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0207830·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing 2 months agoOSC issued.

Cashman, et al. v. Deptuch, et al.

OSC Re: Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Jun 15, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 10, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCashman
DefendantJames J. Deptuch
DefendantAmber L. Deptuch

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0207830 This matter is on calendar for trial setting. At the last hearing on April 27, 2026, the Court noted that the matter needed to be at issue by today’s hearing. Despite having counsel who signed a stipulation on their behalf on January 26, 2026, a responsive pleading has still not been filed by Defendants James J. Deptuch and Amber L. Deptuch. The Court will issue an Order to Show Cause Re: Monetary Sanctions to Plaintiffs and counsel for failure to timely enter default as required by CRC 3.110. Hearing on the Order to Show Cause will be on Monday, August 10, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 63. The clerk is directed to issue the Order to Show Cause. The matter will also be on calendar on Monday, August 10, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for trial setting. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

CLIFTON VS. APPLEWOOD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share