MUCCIOLA VS TEMEREALTY CORPORATION

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME S.B.S. TRUST DEED MOTION CLAIM FOR SURPLUS CVME2504565 NETWORK VS COUNTY OF FUNDS IN INTERPLEADER RIVERSIDE Tentative Ruling: Hearing Required

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MUCCIOLA VS CVME2504606 TEMEREALTY MOTION TO SET ASIDE CORPORATION Tentative Ruling: Motion is denied. Defendant has failed to attach a proposed responsive pleading.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME FUTURE INDUSTRIES, LLC CVME2506572 MOTION TO SET ASIDE VS CAVASOS Tentative Ruling: Motion is denied. Request for Sanctions denied. Defendants have failed to provide sufficient showing of Mistake, Inadvertence, Surprise or Excusable Neglect. No responsive pleading proposed either.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY CVRI2102037 LOPEZ VS REVLINE LLC APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Tentative Ruling: Motion is continued to July 23, 2026 8:30 am M301. There are still some issues with the proposed settlement to be addressed.

(CMO ¶ G.3.b.) Williams declaration does indicate defense counsel is not aware of any class, representative, or other collective action in any other court or jurisdiction asserting similar claims on behalf of an overlapping class. However, it does not indicate whether reasonable inquiry was made within the law firm.

(CMO ¶ G.3.c.iv.) Defense counsel has provided his declaration regarding a relationship with the proposed cy pres recipient. But Plaintiff’s counsel has not addressed in his declaration regarding his relationship with the proposed cy pres recipient.

(CMO ¶ G.3.d.ii.) Defendant is administering the settlement. However, it provides no declaration regarding its experience to carry out the administrator of funds and qualifications to do so competently. If Defendant is going to administer the settlement, it should submit a declaration regarding settlement administration as