LITTLE VS ROCKET TITLE INSURANCE

similar defect trends in other vehicles is relevant and good cause exists for said documents. As to no. 59, Plaintiffs in their reply state that they are no longer moving to compel a further response to no.

59.

Motion to Compel Further Reponses to Request for Production of Documents is GRANTED as to numbers 16, 17, 53 and 62.

Motion to Compel Further Reponses to Request for Production of Documents is DENIED as to numbers 9, 54 and 61.

The Motion is MOOT as to number 59.

Defendant to provide further responses and/or a privileged log, if applicable, within 30 days.

No sanctions are awarded.

The Trial Setting Conference is continued from 6.23.26 to 8.24.26. The Order to Show Cause re TSC declaration is vacated.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND 2ND LITTLE VS ROCKET TITLE AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR BREACH

INSURANCE OF CONTRACT/WARRANTY OF AUDREY LITTLE BY AUDREY LITTLE Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion is vacated. A third amended complaint was filed following the court sustaining demurrers to the 2nd Amended complaint on 5.28.26. The court is setting an Order to Show Cause re Third Amended Complaint for 7.02.26.

Plaintiff has filed two documents labelled Third Amendment, one on 5.29.26 just after the court’s ruling on the demurrer, and another on 6.03.26. Parties are directed to be prepared to discuss this issue as well as the scheduling of future motions including Plaintiff’s motions for summary adjudication and discovery motions.